<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best results are worth waiting for.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elektrik.com/blog/social_marketing/the-best-results-are-worth-waiting-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elektrik.com/blog/social_marketing/the-best-results-are-worth-waiting-for/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Advertising Today focuses on combining the benefits of social media and online marketing with traditional advertising, collateral, promotion and event marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:36:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry Brauner</title>
		<link>http://elektrik.com/blog/social_marketing/the-best-results-are-worth-waiting-for/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Brauner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elektrik.com/blog/?p=307#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Hi Rena,

Many companies spend enormous sums on image advertising.

Periodically they measure awareness and attitude. They don&#039;t expect their ad campaigns to convert into immediate sales.

They buy reach and frequency and collect non-sales data that will hopefully trend upward and affirm the effectiveness of their media buys.

With social media they&#039;re buying something vaguer than reach and frequency, and they&#039;re buying something that&#039;s completely new and therefore unprecedented.

No wonder they&#039;re skeptical and nervous.

To make matters worse, they&#039;re being delivered data that&#039;s different from the stats they&#039;re used to reading.

Perhaps, during an intermediate phase, they should conduct offline research and collect the same attitude, awareness and top-box data that they&#039;re accustomed to. Not that I&#039;m advocating such data in general, but politically and psychologically it would seem to make sense.

Very gradually, the metrics will be able to evolve over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rena,</p>
<p>Many companies spend enormous sums on image advertising.</p>
<p>Periodically they measure awareness and attitude. They don&#8217;t expect their ad campaigns to convert into immediate sales.</p>
<p>They buy reach and frequency and collect non-sales data that will hopefully trend upward and affirm the effectiveness of their media buys.</p>
<p>With social media they&#8217;re buying something vaguer than reach and frequency, and they&#8217;re buying something that&#8217;s completely new and therefore unprecedented.</p>
<p>No wonder they&#8217;re skeptical and nervous.</p>
<p>To make matters worse, they&#8217;re being delivered data that&#8217;s different from the stats they&#8217;re used to reading.</p>
<p>Perhaps, during an intermediate phase, they should conduct offline research and collect the same attitude, awareness and top-box data that they&#8217;re accustomed to. Not that I&#8217;m advocating such data in general, but politically and psychologically it would seem to make sense.</p>
<p>Very gradually, the metrics will be able to evolve over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
